UFO Case Reports
05/12/2014 – Wellington, Telford – Flying Triangle Video & Photograph
Author: Dave Hodrien
Last Updated: 29/12/2014
For reasons of
anonymity pseudonyms have been used
Darren is a contactee who has had a number of experiences
over the years involving UFOs and beings. On the evening of Friday 5th
December 2014 he and his wife Emma witnessed a large triangular-shaped UFO
which they attempted to capture on video.
Sighting Overview
The witnesses were at their home on Rushbury Road, Wellington,
Telford. At approx 7.35pm Emma went out into the back garden for a cigarette
while Darren remained in the living room. It was a cold night with low lying
hazy cloud covering most of the sky, although a few stars and the moon could be
seen through this.
Looking down the garden to the South-West-West, she noticed
several white lights in the distance in the sky behind the copse of trees on
Admaston Road, about half a mile from their location. There were two lights at
the top and one between them lower down making a triangular formation. She at
first assumed these were planes following one another.
However she soon realised that the lights were holding
position with one another and that there was no discernible sound coming from
them. They seemed to rotate slowly in formation with one another, and at this
point she noticed that the area of sky between them was a solid black colour,
darker than the hazy cloud cover. It became clear that what she was looking at
was a massive black triangular-shaped object which had a white flashing light at each of
its corners.
Aerial map showing the
sighting location (A) and the estimated location of the UFO (B):
Photograph near to the
sighting location taken in the direction of the object:
After watching for about 20 seconds she called Darren
shouting “Darren come here quick!” Darren joined her in the back garden and she
pointed out the object to him. At first it was completely motionless but then
after about 6 seconds it began to slowly turn. The object was absolutely huge
in size. Darren estimates it was between 150-200 feet across. Soon after
realising what he was looking at Darren took out Emma’s smartphone which he
happened to have on him. He tried to begin videoing but instead accidentally
took a still photograph in the direction of the object. He then managed to
start the video recording off.
The object hovered motionless for a further 40 seconds before
slowly descending until it was lost from sight behind the tree line. At this Darren
ran inside the house and went upstairs to see if he could still observe the
UFO. However he soon realised it was no longer visible. He stopped filming and
went down to join Emma.
They continued to watch a number of minutes to see if it
would reappear. When it did not Darren decided to immediately call me to inform
me about what they had both witnessed. They did not drive over to where the
object had been situated as Emma was nervous about doing so.
While speaking with them on the phone, they were able to upload and send me both the video and still photograph. Please see below for a full analysis.
Photograph Analysis
Prior to videotaping the UFO, Darren accidentally took a
single still image on the smartphone he was using. Although it is far from
clear due to the darkness at the time, both the witnesses believe that this
photograph has managed to capture the presence of the object in the sky.
Below is the original photograph which Darren took:
Here is the photograph after being ran through some saturation filters on the computer, and with annotations added by Darren:
Below is the original photograph which Darren took:
Here is the photograph after being ran through some saturation filters on the computer, and with annotations added by Darren:
After speaking with the witnesses in great depth
minutes after the sighting took place, I have absolutely no doubt that this is
a real photograph taken at the time of the sighting. Although a definite
triangular shape cannot be made out, it is clear to see that there is something
there which is causing colour differences in the image. As this is at the
location that the witnesses observed the object, we can therefore assume that
it has been picked up.
Video Analysis
Unfortunately, just like the photograph, it was too dark for the camera to pick up most of the object. Here is the video footage which was taken:
After asking the witnesses additional questions and
thoroughly checking the footage, below is an overview of what is seen and
heard:
0.01 - Very small dim light very briefly appears then vanishes again. Darren believes that this is one of the corner lights of the UFO. He says that most of the time the flashing corner lights have not been picked up but very occasionally they were.0.02 - Darren exclaims “There’s no light.” He is referring to the fact that although he can see the UFO with his naked eyes, it is too dark to be picked up on the video screen.
0.03 - Dim light appears to mid right. This is light from the upstairs window of a nearby house and is visible for much of the footage.
0.04 – Darren says “Can’t see anything.”
0.09 – Darren asks “Where is it? Is it still there?” The reason he asks this is that he is looking at the video screen trying to locate the UFO. Emma responds saying “It’s still there darling”.
0.11 – One of the corner lights of the UFO again very briefly appears in a similar location to before.
0.13 – Darren replies “Oh yeah.” At this point he had looked away from the phone and could see the shape of the object and all three flashing white lights.
0.16 – A row of white Christmas lights enters frame at left edge.
0.21 – Darren says “It’s just hovering isn’t it?” to which Emma responds “Mmm.”
0.25 – Emma says “The thing is, what’s that that’s following it?” Emma was standing on the back door step a little higher than Darren at this point. She confirms that she saw what appeared to be lights following in sync of one another seemingly following/approaching the UFO. This suggests that there was another aircraft in the area, perhaps on intercept of the object, perhaps just passing. Either way they may well have been aware of the UFO given its apparent size.
0.30 – Orange street light enters frame at left close to Christmas lights. 0.31 – Emma exclaims “It’s getting brighter”, referring to one of the corner lights of the UFO. However nothing is picked up on camera at this point.
0.33 – Darren says “I can’t see it anymore, ‘cause it’s going over there.” At this point Darren says the object had started to descend and was harder to observe.
0.41 – Emma exclaims “Whoa! See that bright light?” Darren replies “Yeah.” At this time a small light can be seen flickering on and off rapidly near the middle of the frame. The witnesses confirm that this is one of the corner lights shortly before the object vanished from sight behind the tree-line.
0.44 – The nearby bedroom light visible on the right of the frame is switched off.
0.47 – Darren says “I need to go out and look out of the bedroom window.” Emma replies “Go on then. Just don’t let the cats in.” At this point he could no longer see the UFO with his naked eye so wanted to move to a higher vantage point to see if he could spot it again.
0.50 – Darren enters the kitchen and runs through house to continue filming from upstairs. As he moves he says to Emma “You've seen your first UFO!” then “That was seen before weren't it?” (Referring to the previous police sighting)
1.12 – Street light and row of Christmas lights clearly visible from bedroom window. Another orange light and clump of 3 smaller lights also visible in the middle of the picture. These are other local street lighting which were not visible before due to the lower filming height.
1.33 – As the object is no longer in sight Darren switches off the camera.
Sighting Analysis
I have absolutely no doubt that Darren and Emma witnessed
what they said they did. It is clear from the phone call from Darren and
talking on the video that they had both just witnessed something highly
unusual.
I feel quite sure that what was observed was a large
triangular-shaped object with flashing white light at each corner, rather than
three individual flashing objects such as helicopters with strobes on. The
witnesses say that they could see the main body of the object, and that it was
darker than the background sky. Also whenever the lights moved they would all
move together in the same manner, suggesting they were all part of a single
object. The UFO was within half a mile of their position, yet there was no
detectable sound coming from it.
While neither the
photograph or the video footage are conclusive evidence of a large
triangular-shaped object, the flashing light which suddenly appears at 41
seconds into the video footage goes on and off far more quickly than the
flashing lights seen on aircraft and helicopters, tending to suggest it was
something else entirely.
Considering the large size of the object and the fact that
it appeared to be in close proximity to a main road, it is certainly possible
that there are other witnesses who are yet to come forward. However it was very
dark so may not have been noticed by some, and once it had descended below the
treeline it would only have been visible from certain locations.
Looking at all the evidence available I feel it is likely
that the witnesses observed a Flying Triangle, one of the more commonly
reported types of craft, which may well have been extra-terrestrial in origin.
It is unknown whether its presence was anything to do with Darren’s previous contact
experiences or not. There is the possibility it was in the area to monitor him
in some way, however he did not notice direct interaction of any kind.
Darren’s contact experiences have been written up in a
separate report which you can read here. His younger sister is also a
contactee, her case can be read about here.
Copyright Dave Hodrien
2014
BUFOG Search
Total Pageviews
REPORTS ARCHIVE
-
►
2019
(2)
- December 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
-
►
2018
(1)
- December 2018 (1)
-
►
2017
(4)
- November 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (1)
-
►
2016
(1)
- August 2016 (1)
-
►
2015
(1)
- October 2015 (1)
-
▼
2014
(10)
- December 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (4)
- March 2014 (1)
- February 2014 (1)
- January 2014 (1)
-
►
2013
(13)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (1)
- April 2013 (1)
-
►
2012
(10)
- October 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(11)
- December 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (3)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (2)
-
►
2010
(58)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (7)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (10)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (5)
- April 2010 (7)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (10)
-
►
2009
(45)
- December 2009 (6)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (7)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (6)
-
►
2008
(28)
- December 2008 (6)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (4)
- January 2008 (4)
-
►
2007
(17)
- December 2007 (7)
- November 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (1)
- January 2007 (1)
-
►
2006
(2)
- October 2006 (1)
- January 2006 (1)
-
►
2005
(6)
- September 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (3)
- July 2005 (1)
- June 2005 (1)
-
►
2004
(4)
- November 2004 (1)
- September 2004 (1)
- August 2004 (2)
-
►
2003
(3)
- November 2003 (1)
- October 2003 (1)
- January 2003 (1)
-
►
2002
(2)
- November 2002 (1)
- January 2002 (1)
-
►
2000
(3)
- July 2000 (2)
- January 2000 (1)
-
►
1999
(2)
- May 1999 (1)
- January 1999 (1)
-
►
1997
(5)
- July 1997 (2)
- June 1997 (1)
- January 1997 (2)
-
►
1996
(1)
- March 1996 (1)
-
►
1995
(4)
- November 1995 (1)
- October 1995 (1)
- April 1995 (1)
- January 1995 (1)
-
►
1992
(1)
- September 1992 (1)
-
►
1991
(2)
- June 1991 (1)
- January 1991 (1)
-
►
1990
(1)
- January 1990 (1)
-
►
1989
(1)
- November 1989 (1)
-
►
1988
(3)
- August 1988 (1)
- January 1988 (2)
-
►
1987
(2)
- August 1987 (1)
- February 1987 (1)
-
►
1986
(1)
- January 1986 (1)
-
►
1984
(3)
- September 1984 (1)
- August 1984 (1)
- July 1984 (1)
-
►
1982
(2)
- October 1982 (2)
-
►
1981
(2)
- August 1981 (1)
- January 1981 (1)
-
►
1979
(5)
- September 1979 (1)
- August 1979 (1)
- June 1979 (1)
- January 1979 (2)
-
►
1978
(3)
- October 1978 (1)
- August 1978 (1)
- January 1978 (1)
-
►
1977
(3)
- December 1977 (1)
- July 1977 (1)
- January 1977 (1)
-
►
1975
(1)
- January 1975 (1)
-
►
1974
(1)
- August 1974 (1)
-
►
1972
(6)
- April 1972 (1)
- February 1972 (1)
- January 1972 (4)




